2004 Multicultural Workshop Evaluation

2004 Workshop Evaluation - Multicultural Center for Research and Practice - Antioch University New England

Teachers College
Columbia University
Department of Counseling and Clinical Psychology

May 25th 2004
Gargi Roysircar-Sodowsky, PhD
Antioch University New England
Director, Multicultural Center for Research and Practice
Professor, Department of Clinical Psychology
40 Avon Street
Keen, NH 03431-3516

Dear Dr. Roysircar-Sodowsky:
On behalf of the entire staff and attendees of the 2004 Winter Roundtable on Cultural Psychology and Education, thank you again for you presentation titled: “Interviews with Culturally Diverse Individuals: A Live Training Model in Multicutural Counseling Competence.” The Roundtable recognizes that your efforts in designing, creating, and presenting your workshop were integral to the success of the conference. Winter Roundtable attendees were asked to provide feedback to conference presenters. We have compiled the responses for your workshop and have attached an evaluation summary to this letter. We hope that attendees' evaluation will inform future presentations that you may offer.

Sincerely,
Madonna G. Constantine, PhD
Director, Winter Rountables on Cultural Psychology and Education
Teachers College, Columbia University

21st Annual Winter Roundtable Session Evaluation Summary

Title: Interviews with Culturally Diverse Individuals:
A Live Training Model in Multicutural Counseling Competence

Presenter(s): Gargi Roysircar-Sodowsky

All evaluation were on a 5-point scale i.e. 1= poor and 5=excellent

My overall evaluation of this session is:
Total Number of Responses: 14
Mean: 4.50
The presenter's or presenters' level of preparedness was:
Total Number of Responses: 14
Mean: 4.43
The presenter's or presenters' level of knowledge and expertise in the area presented was:
Total Number of Responses: 14
Mean: 4.71
The presenter's or presenters' instruction and teaching ability was:
Total Number of Responses: 12
Mean 4.46
The presenter(s) met the education objectives set forth in the conference program (workshops only)
Total Number of Responses: 14
Mean: 4.46
Use of audio-visual aids and media was:
Total Number of Responses: 10
Mean: 3.57
The physical space provided for the presentation was:
Total Number of Responses: 14
Mean: 4.29
Please make any other comments or suggestion regarding this symposium, paper, or workshop below:
More clarification on balance achieved in interviewing. Would have liked to see all (or at least another) cases—the other ones my role would be an observer.

Interactive, experiential, non-judgmental, supportive.

Good to see. It would have been good if we had more time to discuss with big group.

Excellent! Great case studies and group work!

Last Updated: 4/16/10